Value Creation in Fisheries Supply Chain as A Role Model for Fish Protein Hydrolyzate Cluster Development

Authors

  • Sugeng Santoso (1) Universitas Mercu Buana, Program Studi Magister Manajemen. (2) Coordinating Ministry for Maritime Affairs and Investment
  • Tjiptogoro Dinarjo Soehari Universitas Mercu Buana, Program Studi Magister Manajemen
  • Yoce Aprianto Coordinating Ministry for Maritime Affairs and Investment
  • Dicky Andrean Universitas Mercu Buana, Program Studi Magister Manajemen
  • Henny Henny Coordinating Ministry for Maritime Affairs and Investment

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jrm.2020.011.03.12

Keywords:

Fish Protein Hydrolyzate, Added Value, Value Creation, Technology Readiness Level, Innovation Readiness Level

Abstract

To increase the level of competitiveness in the maritime and fisheries industry in Indonesia, the creation of added value products, such as Fish Protein Hydrolyzate (FHP) would be essential to accelerate this mission. This value creation occurs along the fisheries supply chain, including fishermen, shippers, fish processing units, and industry. To assess the innovation maturity, the FHP machine was assessed with the Technology Readiness Level (TRL) and Innovation Readiness Level (IRL). The TLR was carried out by TRL-Meter and IRL was carried out by IRL-Meter. The data was collected by interviews and questionnaires with related stakeholders. The data assessed that the machine met the requirement for TRL level 9 and IRL Level 3. The recommendation for TRL 9 and IRL 3 has been conducted through a strategic partnership with a related state-owned enterprise. Because the FHP shows product competitiveness, gives value-added, and generates value creation in the fisheries supply chain, it could be a role model for the development of the FHP cluster in another location. However, the involvement of local and central governments still needs to be improved significantly. Furthermore, the government should build a conducive ecosystem for technology-based innovation in the country.

References

NURKHOLIS, NURYADIN D, SYAIFUDIN N, HANDIKA R, SETYOBUDI R H and UDJIANTO D W 2016. The Economic of Marine Sector in Indonesia Aquat. Procedia 7 181–6.

KKP | KEMENTERIAN KELAUTAN dan PERIKANAN (2018). BPS Nilai Sub-Sektor Perikanan Budidaya Mampu Dongkrak Pertumbuhan Ekonomi. [online] Available at: https://kkp.go.id/artikel/2896-bps-nilai-sub-sektor-perikanan-budidaya-mampu-dongkrak-pertumbuhan-ekonomi (Accessed 12 Jul. 2020).

FAO 2014 The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture: Opportunities and challenges (Rome)

KKP | KEMENTERIAN KELAUTAN dan PERIKANAN (2020). Triwulan I 2020, Nilai Ekspor Peri-kanan Capai USD 1,24 Miliar. [online] Available at: https://kkp.go.id/artikel/18769-triwulan-i-2020-nilai-ekspor-perikanan-capai-usd1-24-miliar (Accessed 23 Aug. 2020).

KKP | KEMENTERIAN KELAUTAN dan PERIKANAN (2020). Pandemi Covid-19, Estimasi Panen Perikanan Budidaya Capai 450 Ribu Ton Sepanjang April Hingga Juni 2020. [online] Available at: https://kkp.go.id/artikel/18532-pandemi-covid-19-estimasi-panen-perikanan-budidaya-capai-450-ribu-ton-sepanjang-april-hingga-juni-2020 (Accessed 12 Jul. 2020).

K. SCHWAB and WEF 2019 Insight Report - World Economic Forum (Geneva).

M. VIDJAK 2019 The Competitive Advantage of Nations (University of Zagreb).

MULDERS M 2001 Value Chain, Porter 101 Manag. Model. 364–6.

SANTOSO S and IMAN MS, 2005 Konsep ekonomi berbasis pengetahuan untuk Indonesia (Jakarta: Badan Pengkajian dan Penerapan Teknologi).

AGUSTINE I (2014). Sharif: Inovasi Tingkatkan Daya Saing Kelautan dan Perikanan. [online] Avail-able at: https://ekonomi.bisnis.com/read/20140930/99/261041/sharif-inovasi-tingkatkan-daya-saing-kelautan-dan-perikanan (Accessed 13 Jul. 2020).

KKP | KEMENTERIAN KELAUTAN dan PERIKANAN 2020 Pembangunan infrastruktur kelautan dan perikanan: rapat koordinasi bidang kemaritiman dan investasi (Jakarta).

MENTERI KELAUTAN dan PERIKANAN REPUBLIK INDONESIA 2007 Keputusan Menteri Kelau-tan dan Perikanan Republik Indonesia Nomor KEP.02/MEN/2007 tentang Cara Budidaya Ikan yang Baik 14 p.

SANDERO J 2020 Penerapan rekayasa nilai untuk menghasilkan rekomendasi alternatif guna meningkatkan nilai tukar petani ikan di kalbar (Universitas Mercu Buana).

JERMSITTIPARSERT K, SUTDUEAN J and SRIYAKUL T 2019 Effect of service innovation and market intelligence on supply chain performance in Indonesian fishing industry Ind. Eng. Manag. Syst. 18 407–16.

ARVITRIDA N I, RAHMAWATI D, LASTOMO D, RINDAWATI and KUSNADI 2019 Fishery Supply Chains in Indonesia: Improvement Opportunities on The Downstream Side 2 253–7

SUADI and KUSANO E 2019 Indonesian seafood supply chain Food value Chain ASEAN Case Stud. Focus. local Prod. 134–63.

HEAP J, O’ROURKE S, DILLON R, CHAPLIN L, 2014 Case study 7: Indonesian fisheries (Marketing Cases from Emerging Markets vol 9783642368) In: Mutum D S, Roy S K and Kipnis E (Berlin, Hei-delberg: Springer).

THE ECONOMIST 2016 Jokowi’s moment (London: The Rights and Syndication Department).

BAPPENAS 2020 Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Nasional 2020-2024 (Jakarta).

ALI A and HASEEB M 2019 Radio frequency identification (RFID) technology as a strategic tool towards higher performance of supply chain operations in textile and apparel industry of Malaysia Uncertain Supply Chain Management 7 215-226.

HASEEB M, ZANDI G, HARTANI N H, PAHI M H and NADEEM S 2019 Environmental analysis of the effect of population growth rate on supply chain performance and economic growth of Indonesia Ekoloji 28 417-426.

HASEEB M, ABIDIN I S Z, HYE Q M A, and HARTANI N H 2018 The impact of renewable energy on economic well-being of Malaysia: Fresh evidence from auto regressive distributed lag bound testing approach International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy 9 269-275.

SURYANTO T, HASEEB M, and HARTANI N H 2018 The correlates of developing green supply chain management practices: Firms level analysis in Malaysia International Journal of Supply Chain Management 7 316-324.

DEN HERTOG P and BILDERBEEK R 1999 Conceptualising service innovation and service innova-tion patterns Themat. essay 1–30.

EDVARDSSON B, GUSTAFSSON A, SANDEÌN B, and JOHNSON M D, 2000 New service development and inno- vation in the new economy (Lund: Studenlitteratur).

ORDANINI A and PARASURAMAN A, 2011 Service innovation viewed through a service-dominant logic lens: A conceptual framework and empirical analysis Journal of Service Research 14 3-23.

JOEWONO H, SANTOSO S, UTOMO RGP, ROSPITAWATI R, RISWATI, and KARTIKASARI N, 2020 Buku Rekomendasi Strategis Pengembangan UKM Dari Sudut Pandang Alumni Perguruan Tinggi Negeri (Jakarta: UKM Kampus HIMPUNI).

BASTL M, JOHNSON M, LIGHTFOOT H and EVANS S 2012 Buyer-supplier relationships in a servitized environment: An examination with Cannon and Perreault’s framework Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 32 650–75.

TAMA I P, YUNIARTI R, EUNIKE A, HAMDALA I and AZLIA W 2019 Risk identification in cassava chip supply chain using SCOR (Supply Chain Operation Reference) IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 494.

SANTOSO P B, CHOIRI M, and RAHMAN A 2013 Integrasi supplier, produsen, dan pelanggan pada ukm keramik dinoyo dengan cloud computing Jurnal Rekayasa Mesin 4 59–66.

Downloads

Published

2020-12-31

Issue

Vol. 11 No. 3 (2020)

Section

Articles

License